Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Cannon Kingsley vs Alex Michelsen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kingsley vs Michelsen analysis and find out who is favored!
Cannon Kingsley vs Alex Michelsen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kingsley 1 - 0 Michelsen
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kingsley has won 54.59% of points on their second serve, while Michelsen has won 51.39%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kingsley, in recent form, has won 54.91% of their opponent's second serve points, while Michelsen has won 49.53%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.88% and 31.16% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kingsley has saved 60.42% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Michelsen has saved 59.92% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kingsley has won 56.25% of matches played (W/L 27/ 21), with Michelsen winning 60.98% (W/L 50/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kingsley has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 22/ 12), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 40/ 32). Michelsen has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 83% (W/L 29/ 6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 8/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Kingsley has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 14/ 14), where as Michelsen has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 71.05% of matches (W/L 27/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kingsley winning 1 times and Michelsen being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kingsley winning 2 and Michelsen winning 0. The last match between Kingsley and Michelsen was at the Charlottesville Challenger, 31-10-2023, First, I.hard with Cannon Kingsley getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:22:7.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kingsley and Michelsen have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kingsley winning 0 times and Michelsen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kingsley winning 0, and Michelsen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kingsley has played against opponents with an average rank of 205.46 while Michelsen has played against players with an average rank of 195.13.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kingsley has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Michelsen has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kingsley has converted 44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Michelsen has converted 42.11% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
408
Rank
404
High
23
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
61
Rank
60
High
19
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
59% (99-68)
Career Total W/L
66% (100-52)
50% (4-4)
YTD W/L
47% (16-18)
$0
Career Prize Money
$576,570
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Cannon Kingsley | Alex Michelsen |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:22:7 | 1:22:7 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (35/65) | 64% (37/58) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 86% (30/35) | 84% (31/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (17/30) | 29% (6/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/4) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (21/58) | 28% (18/65) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Alex Michelsen
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
31 of
37)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Cannon Kingsley | Alex Michelsen |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (4/4) | 47% (16/18) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (11/11) | 49% (43/44) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (116/109) | 50% (411/410) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 61% (11/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 31% (4/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (4/3) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.65 | 0.33 |
| Aces Total | 71 | 132 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 15 | 80 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:11:15 | 1:49:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 38.5 | 100.91 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (483/701) | 68% (1739/2566) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (348/483) | 66% (1151/1739) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (119/218) | 51% (425/827) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (22/50) | 42% (96/228) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (259/709) | 38% (929/2422) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/5) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (11/8) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (4/8) | 47% (14/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/4) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 50% (7/14) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 31% (4/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 60% (5/3) | 72% (18/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 40% (5/2) | 28% (18/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (3/1) | 19% (16/3) |
Cannon Kingsley Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Cannon Kingsley
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Karue Sell
Player
Cannon Kingsley
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
76%
(
58 of
76)
6
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
23 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
23 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Nathan Mao
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Cannon Kingsley
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
75%
(
65 of
87)
10
Aces
16
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
52 of
65)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
24 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Henry Searle
69%
(
64 of
93)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
9
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
49 of
64)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
27 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
101)
100
Total Points Won
94
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Jonas Forejtek
74%
(
78 of
106)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
109)
10
Aces
8
-
Double Faults
-
78%
(
61 of
78)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
26 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
34 of
109)
114
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 6-7(7) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
71%
(
73 of
103)
1st Serve %
67%
(
71 of
106)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
50 of
71)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
113
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Cannon Kingsley
48%
(
48 of
99)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
107)
7
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
7
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
33%
(
17 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
46 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
49 of
107)
102
Total Points Won
104
|
6-3 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Cannon Kingsley
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
66%
(
89 of
135)
13
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
54 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
65 of
89)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
22 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
46 of
135)
125
Total Points Won
111
|
7-5 6-7(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Cannon Kingsley
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
7
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
4
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Alex Michelsen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Alex Michelsen
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
75 of
117)
11
Aces
11
6
Double Faults
4
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
47 of
75)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
52 of
117)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Alex Michelsen
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
75%
(
61 of
81)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
47 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Taylor Fritz
74%
(
70 of
95)
1st Serve %
57%
(
67 of
118)
2
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
54 of
118)
113
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
36 of
47)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Alex Michelsen
81%
(
52 of
64)
1st Serve %
77%
(
56 of
73)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Henrique Rocha
72%
(
73 of
102)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
35 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
97
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pavel Kotov
Player
Alex Michelsen
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Alex Michelsen
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Fonseca
Player
Alex Michelsen
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
93
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Kingsley Vs Michelsen Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Kingsley are available here and Michelsen photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Cannon Kingsley
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Alex Michelsen
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
